Suggested Games Chat Forum re-organisation

[Sideshow]

Can I suggest a slight change? I don't think that:

CS (and general HL mods)
Source (inc. CS:S)

is a very good split. I can see the logic, but I think that:

Half-Life + Mods
Source + Mods
CS + CS:S

would be better.

[DAve]

a) there was a post already set up in the chats about this.
http://guns.snakebomb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2278

b) there's no excuse for those kind of subject titles. You just piss people off. Especially where people=me.

[Sideshow]

well,

a) doesn't seem directly relevant, and

b) huh?

[Sideshow]

b) there's no excuse for those kind of subject titles. You just piss people off. Especially where people=me.

This had me confused for a while. At first I thought you were joking, and then re-reading it doesn't seem you are. I thought my original title, something like 'Take me to your leader' was innocuous. I only just now remembered the exact wording - "Who's in charge around here?".
I meant this to sound like the lowly private turning up to his new platoon, but I realise now it can also be read like "WTF? What idiot set it up like this?", which was not the tone I was aiming for at all. Sorry DAve, no disrespect intended.

[DAve]

Appology accepted.

Back to the thread; the reason I didn't want to lump CS and CS:S in the same thread is because I was fairly sure that the CS crew would complain that they're a wholy different kettle of fish. I don't see them being that different, I just wanted an easy life - so thought that this would be the option that would appeal to most people :)

[Fyndir]

b) there's no excuse for those kind of subject titles. You just piss people off. Especially where people=me.

This had me confused for a while. At first I thought you were joking, and then re-reading it doesn't seem you are. I thought my original title, something like 'Take me to your leader' was innocuous. I only just now remembered the exact wording - "Who's in charge around here?".
I meant this to sound like the lowly private turning up to his new platoon, but I realise now it can also be read like "WTF? What idiot set it up like this?", which was not the tone I was aiming for at all. Sorry DAve, no disrespect intended.

I had THRICE the confusion because you'd changed it by the time I saw the topic. =/

[Sideshow]

Look DAve! The *cough* masses *cough* have spoken!

[DAve]

OK, if three count as masses :)

Unless I count the 46 people who didn't reply as having tacit agreement with the status quo...

[Sideshow]

Seems more likely they saw what was winning, and felt they didn't need to vote. If you ask me. :)

[DAve]

Done. And updated RPG forums to what they were meant to be: Strategy. Do'h.